The Leo Wanta Saga, Pt. 15: Bush Stalling 'At 12th Hour' Wanta $4.5 Trillion Deal To Improve American Economy

Last minute negotiations were underway late night on July 31 between the White House and Ambassador Leo Wanta to release $4.5 trillion in repatriated funds into the American economy, according to Michael C. Cottrell, Wanta's financial consultant and AmeriTrust Groupe Inc., treasurer.

Wanta earlier had given U.S. authorities until the close of business on July 31 to honor a written agreement and release the massive sum of money to his AmeritTrust Groupe on behalf of the American people.

The trillion dollar deal, which would immediately revitalize and give the American economy a needed boost, however, amounts to only a portion of the $27.5 trillion in offshore funds Wanta accumulated after the Cold War when he was assigned by President Ronald Reagan to devalue and destabilize the Russian currency.

"Apparently, the White House is using California time as a deadline to release the money and it should be a long night," said Cottrell, who said the main parties of AmeriTrust, including Ambassador Wanta, were waiting to hear directly from the White House, as President Bush appears to be the only one standing between "a done deal" or backing out of the written agreement fashioned by two federal court judges.

Cottrell added he has always remained positive the money would be released before Wanta's deadline expired, saying in case it isn't AmeriTrust is prepared to file a federal law suit against governmental interests illegally blocking the deal and blocking them from paying $1.6 trillion in U.S. and state tax money, as well as using the balance of the "qausi public" money to immediately improve basic needs and infrastructure improvements.

Asked about the release of the money late Monday afternoon, Christopher Story, editor of the International Currency Review, a London based financial publication following the explosive international story, said a Florida contact in the financial community aware of the worldwide ramifications gave the chances of the money being released "a nine on a scale of 10."

Both Story and Cottrell will be appearing Tuesday on Greg Szymanski's radio show, The Investigative Journal, to explain the final outcome of the Monday night Wanta negotiations, either reporting the money had been released with proper receipt or to explain Wanta's plan to recover the money earmarked for the American people.

Wanta and Cottrell both previously stated if the money isn't released by the end of business on July 31, they planned to file a federal law suit and to further seek recovery of the entire offshore funds estimated at between $27.5 and $70 trillion.

Here is a breakdown of the negotiated Wanta Plan, indicating a healthy injection of liquid funds are right around the corner if the American people wake-up before it's too late:

The agreement provides for the prepayment of taxes to the US Treasury, at a rate of 35% of the $4.5 trillion, equating to $1,575 trillion, together with prepayment of taxation to the State of Virginia at 6%, amounting to some $270 billion.

In addition, Wanta through his AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., has put financial mechanisms in place for the further generation of corporation tax deposits payable to the U.S. Treasury Department/Internal Revenue Service of about $96 billion per banking day.

Because of financing transactions which will consequently be carried out by other U.S. financial institutions, estimated total windfall accruals to the U.S. Treasury are likely to exceed $200 billion per banking day, from the moment of start-up. This is now running nearly three months late.

Wanta, the legal trustor of more than $27.5 trillion dollars in offshore funds illegally diverted by the last three Presidential administrations, recently entered into a $4.5 trillion settlement with U.S. authorities on the direction of two federal court judges.

However, President Bush and Fed have illegally blocked the money for over a month with Wanta now losing patience and giving authorities until the close of business on July 31 to fork over the money or saying he intends to file a federal lawsuit, as well as proceed after the entire $27.5 trillion which may have matured over the years to $70 trillion.

Although the story has been called the "biggest financial in the history of the world" due to the connected corruption by the Bush and Clinton crime families who have back stabbed Ambassador Wanta who all along wanted to return the money to the American people as President Reagan had directed.

America stands now at the precipice of regaining its pride, honor and financial strength. Further, if Americans remain strong perhaps we can put a stop to the Illuminati's goal of financially destroying the country.

To learn more about the Leo Wanta saga and other stories vital to our world, go to independent journalist Greg Szymanski's http://www.arcticbeacon.com and listen to his international radio show at http://www.gcnlive.com Monday-Friday from 4-6pm central.

Biblical Support for the Authority of the Pope

Infallable? The Pope does not sin?

Many Protestants do not understand Catholic terminology (many Catholics don't either!) Suffice to say, some of them believe that Catholics profess the Pope to be without sin. ImageThis idea is of course inconsistent with Scripture (Romans 3:23). As such, this is certainly not the position of the Catholic Church. Infallibility refers to his teaching, not his conduct. Infallibility does not mean impecability.

Simply put, the Catholic term "infallability" refers only to the official teachings of the Pope when the following conditions are met:

* he is teaching to the universal Church
* it is an issue regarding faith and morals (not merely customs and discipline)
* he specifically intends to profess such a teaching

The personal opinion of the Pope about the Middle Eastern conflict, while perhaps valuable for all mankind to consider, would not fall under the doctrine of infallability. Nor would his hope for a certain soccer team to win the World Cup. Finally, it should be noted that the use of this ultimate authority is very rare, having taken place only a few times in history.
Where is it in the Bible?

Simply communicating, with charity, to Protestants what Catholics actually believe about the Pope and his authority, is the first step in discussing this topic. The next step is to demonstrate from Scripture that the Catholic position is in fact the position taught within its pages.

* First, Christ appointed the first Pope, Peter. (Matthew 16:18)
* Christ gave specific authority to Peter, alone. (Matthew 16:19)
* Peter confirms the Catholic interpretation of Matthew 16:18-19 when he exercised authority during one of the earliest disputes mentioned in Scripture. (Acts 15)
* Peter was often mentioned first when the other Apostles were named. In other cases, Scripture just names Peter, and then mentions the others who "were with him". (Matt. 10:1-4, Mark 3:16-19, Luke 6:14-16, Acts 1:13 Luke 9:32)
* Peter was so important to the early believers that even Peter's shadow brought about miraculous healings. (Acts 5:15)
* As the leader of the Church founded by Christ (Matthew 16:18-19), Christ promised the assistance of the Holy Spirit to his Church, and promised he would be with it forever. (John 14:8-17)
* Paul wanted complete unity among all believers regarding their doctrines and belief (1 Corinthians 1:10)

The above passages demonstate that the Holy Spirit never lies, and as such, the Catholic Church, when invoking the assistance of the Holy Spirit, speaks without error. This is the ultimate meaning of infalliblity.

Sometimes Scripture is not Enough for Protestants.

Non-Catholics may debate the interpretations of the above verses. You may be prepared to answer their objects verse by verse, or you may not. The following is a line of logic for the absolute "need" for Papal authority:

In the United States we have a master document that guides much of our lives: the Constitution. For Christians, they have a master document as well: the Bible.

The Founding Fathers of the United States realized that if everyone were able to interpret the Constitution as they saw fit, that there would complete chaos and anarchy. As a result, they instituted an ultimate authority, the Supreme Court, to interpret the Constitution for us.

In a similar way, the Founding Father of Christianity realized that if people were able to interpret the Scriptures on their own, that complete anarchy and division would persist within Christianity. As such, he instituted an ultimate authority, the Catholic Church, to interpret the Bible for us.

Protestantism has demonstrated Scripture to be true. This is why they have over 30,000 denominations and divisons. This division is counter biblical. According to Scripture, unity and truth are lost when individuals take it upon themselves to privately interpret Scripture. They do this, according to the Bible, "to their own destruction." (2nd. Peter 3:15-18) Fortunately for the majority of Christians in the world --- who happen to be Catholic --- they have the successor of Peter, to whom the assistance of the Holy Spirit was guaranteed, to guide them on issues of Scripture interpretation, faith and morals. And following his guidance is something in keeping with the Bible, which they do to their own benefit. Indeed, the infallibility of the Pope does make the Catholic Church a Church with a lifetime guarantee.

Lee Anderson is the developer of http://CatholicLibrary.com, a Catholic website featuring more than 11, 000 articles in the Catholic Encyclopedia LIVE!